Plotting the train of thought
The minimum requirement for the clarity of the paper writing service is that the line of reasoning is absolutely clear, at least to the writer. It is worth pointing out several times where your train of thought starts, where it is going, along what route and with what detours. Let us not forget that clarity is also an essential tool for persuasion: if you do not write clearly, you will soon be seen to be trying to hide your uncertainty.
It is best to make preliminary sketches of the route. This is the very first step in writing a study (once you have researched the relevant sources).
The overall clarity of the study depends largely on the preliminary establishment of the structure. You do not have to figure out what you are writing about as you write. The most common reason for failure in writing is that the author does not turn over in his or her mind, does not form the mini-world in which the message is situated. Writing an outline is not the same as editing a full-length text, but rather placing the theses, arguments and events of the sources reviewed in a mini-world of our own thoughts, criticisms and explanations. And most importantly, to put them into context. The final text can then be built on these mini-worlds like meat on a skeleton. The outline can record the order in which it is worth presenting the relevant views and the various concepts, the ideas and considerations that can be used to counter the criticised position, presentation and interpretation. In determining the order in which to present our considerations, it is helpful to consider which presupposes which and which warrants further consideration. It is worthwhile to build up the edifice of our arguments sparingly, building on one another, otherwise we risk getting lost in it ourselves.
We can always carry our essential drafts with us, and discuss them with others more quickly and effectively than a final text. We can test on our future readers the level of complexity at which they do not lose interest or the thread of our thinking. Rarely is there a discussion, even if the person we are talking to is not well versed in the field, that we do not find that we ourselves have a better understanding of what it is we are trying to explore. If the duration of a coffee break is not long enough to buy thesis what we have to say, we should start to suspect that we have gone too far.
It is often the case that the enthusiastic essayist wants to take on too big a task in his essay. The result is usually that the paper is unreadably dense. When new ideas come treading on each other's heels, they are rarely adequately explained and defended one by one. It is therefore better not to be over-ambitious and come up with earth-shattering conclusions in a paper of a few pages. Rather, let us take smaller, moderately ambitious, small steps, but let us do them clearly, carefully and with good reasons to back them up. Slower movement, more precise arc.
After writing the outline, it is worth writing a working draft of the paper. The common English term for this is the draft. Unlike the outline, the working draft is no longer an ordered list of points, items and considerations, but a continuous text. However, this text still does not strive for any particular literary elegance, its style being more that of simple direct prose. It consists of short sentences and short paragraphs, using simple phrases. It is superfluous, and often ridiculous, to mobilise big words and deep concepts where simple ones will do. To avoid turgidity and mannerisms, use expressions that would be used in simple conversation.
